Document Type

Discussion Paper

Publication Date

1-1-1984

CFDP Number

688R

CFDP Revision Date

1984-11-01

CFDP Pages

19

Abstract

This essay is concerned with a monopolist’s incentives to provide a high quality goods when some of its customers cannot observe quality prior to purchase. We show that if all buyers have the same tastes for quality, the monopolist will not try to take advantage of the poorly informed. When tastes differ, however, some quality randomization may become profitable as a means to loosen binding self-selection constraints. The profitability of randomization is shown to depend upon the relative degrees of risk aversion of the buyers and on the convexity of the firm’s cost of quality function. We view our results as pointing to some potential benefits from imperfect quality control.

Included in

Economics Commons

Share

COinS