Description
OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgery is potentially curative in chronic epilepsy but can only be offered to patients if the surgical risk to language is known. Clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an ideal, noninvasive method for localizing language cortex yet remains to be validated for this purpose. We have recently presented a novel method for localizing language cortex. Here we present a preliminary evaluation of this method’s validity. We hypothesized language regions identified using this novel method would demonstrate stronger functional connectivity than randomly generated set of proximal networks. METHOD: fMRI data were collected from sixteen temporal lobe patients (12 left) being evaluated for epilepsy surgery at UCLA (mean age 38.9 [sd 11.4]; 6 female; per Wada 14 left language dominant, 1 right, 1 mixed). Language maps were generated using a recently standardized method relying on a conjunction of language tasks (e.g., visual object naming; auditory naming; reading) to identify known language regions (Broca’s area; inferior and superior Wernicke’s Areas; Angular gyrus; Basal Temporal Language Area; Exner’s Area; and Supplementary Speech Area). With activations defined as network nodes, mean network connectivity was compared via permutation tests with alternate (i) fully random and (ii) proximal random networks. Mean network connectivity was determined in independently-acquired motor fMRI datasets (9 foot, 16 hand, 14 tongue). FINDINGS: 77% (30/39) of clinician-derived language networks exhibited mean connectivity greater than fully random networks (p<0.05). Similarly, 69% (27/39) of clinician-derived language networks exhibited mean connectivity greater than proximal random networks (p<0.05). Further analysis of networks not passing the permutation test suggests that low connectivity of non-valid networks may be driven not by low connectivity across all nodes, but by individual nodes that may not actually possess membership within the network. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary validity for a novel, clinician-based approach to mapping language cortex pre-surgery. This complements our recent work showing this method is reliable, and supports a proposed study comparing fMRI language maps using this technique with the results of direct stimulation mapping.
Included in
Bioimaging and Biomedical Optics Commons, Nervous System Diseases Commons, Neurology Commons, Neurosciences Commons, Other Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment Commons, Surgery Commons, Surgical Procedures, Operative Commons
Initial validation of a novel method of presurgical language localization through functional connectivity (fcMRI)
OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgery is potentially curative in chronic epilepsy but can only be offered to patients if the surgical risk to language is known. Clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an ideal, noninvasive method for localizing language cortex yet remains to be validated for this purpose. We have recently presented a novel method for localizing language cortex. Here we present a preliminary evaluation of this method’s validity. We hypothesized language regions identified using this novel method would demonstrate stronger functional connectivity than randomly generated set of proximal networks. METHOD: fMRI data were collected from sixteen temporal lobe patients (12 left) being evaluated for epilepsy surgery at UCLA (mean age 38.9 [sd 11.4]; 6 female; per Wada 14 left language dominant, 1 right, 1 mixed). Language maps were generated using a recently standardized method relying on a conjunction of language tasks (e.g., visual object naming; auditory naming; reading) to identify known language regions (Broca’s area; inferior and superior Wernicke’s Areas; Angular gyrus; Basal Temporal Language Area; Exner’s Area; and Supplementary Speech Area). With activations defined as network nodes, mean network connectivity was compared via permutation tests with alternate (i) fully random and (ii) proximal random networks. Mean network connectivity was determined in independently-acquired motor fMRI datasets (9 foot, 16 hand, 14 tongue). FINDINGS: 77% (30/39) of clinician-derived language networks exhibited mean connectivity greater than fully random networks (p<0.05). Similarly, 69% (27/39) of clinician-derived language networks exhibited mean connectivity greater than proximal random networks (p<0.05). Further analysis of networks not passing the permutation test suggests that low connectivity of non-valid networks may be driven not by low connectivity across all nodes, but by individual nodes that may not actually possess membership within the network. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary validity for a novel, clinician-based approach to mapping language cortex pre-surgery. This complements our recent work showing this method is reliable, and supports a proposed study comparing fMRI language maps using this technique with the results of direct stimulation mapping.