Date of Award
12-21-2009
Document Type
Open Access Thesis
Degree Name
Medical Doctor (MD)
First Advisor
Jonathan Grauer MD
Second Advisor
Peter G. Whang MD
Abstract
Cervical oblique radiographs are often obtained to evaluate the patency of the intervertebral foramina. Previous work has demonstrated that computed tomography(CT), particularly oblique reconstructions of the spine, allows for the accurate measurement of foramina1 dimensions. Although oblique radiographs are routinely ordered by practitioners for this reason, there are currently no studies that have directly compared these measurements to those derived from CT scans. The purpose of this study was to establish any correlation between the dimensions of cervical foramina assessed from oblique radiographs to those observed on CT scans. Radiographs of four fresh-frozen cadaveric cervical spine specimens were obtained at an angle of 50 degrees. Using digital measurement tools, the foramina1 height, width and cross-sectional area were calculated at each level between C2-C3 and C7-T1. CT scans were subsequently performed so that these values could also be acquired from 50 degree oblique reconstructions. Statistical analyses revealed excellent inter-observer reliabilities for radiographs and CT scans (ICC 0.91 and 0.99 for height, 0.90 and 0.97 for width, and 0.84 and 0.92 for area). For the two imaging modalities, the Pearson correlation coefficients for height, width, and area were 0.439, 0.871, and 0.899; which corresponds to a moderate correlation for height and strong correlations for width and area. The only significant differences (p<0.05) between CT and radiograph measurements were for height at the C6/C7 and C7/T1, for width at the C5/6, and for area at the C2/3. Based on these findings, we believe that oblique radiographs provide reasonably accurate estimates of intervertebral foraminal dimensions for the initial evaluation of the cervical spine.
Recommended Citation
Sabino, Jennifer, "The assessment of cervical foraminal area on oblique radiographs as compared to computed tomography" (2009). Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library. 425.
https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ymtdl/425
This Article is Open Access
Comments
This is an Open Access Thesis.